You are in:

iPad or Windows Tablet for AAC?

by Paul Nisbet

on Thu May 19, 2016

Share this blog

Share on:

  • Twitter share
  • Facebook share
  • linkedin share
  • Google+ share

At present there are:

Since you're here...

training course

CALL Scotland course,
University of Edinburgh
17th January, 2019

Assistive Technology to support visual impairment

training courseNewsletter

Get news, articles, advice and tips.

Sign me up!

For Digital Learning Week, we're looking at some examples of Assistive and Communication Technology and today I'm going to offer some reflections on voice output communication aids. In particular, we'll consider some pros and cons of using an iPad for communication, versus a Windows tablet.

A Brief History of VOCAs

Voice output aids have been around for decades - one of the earliest was created in the mid 1980's by David Mason, for Professor Stephen Hawking. By 2000 voice output aids were available commercially from a whole range of manufacturers. They were, compared to ordinary computers, relatively expensive, reflecting the costs of developing bespoke electronics, hardware and software, and a relatively small market.

Then in 2010 the iPad was launched. It was and is, a small, light, easy to use device, but it was the 'app' ecosystem that really changed the software and computer game: instead of going along to PC World and paying quite a lot of money for a box with a CD, which you then installed on your computer, you paid 69p and got the software on your iPad immediately. Paying no or very little money for software can have it's disadvantages, in that you may get no or very little support to help you make it work, but there's no doubt that the iPad has had a huge impact on how we obtain and use personal technology, and this has also impacted on voice output communication technology. But we now have Android and Windows tablets as well, so where does that leave the iPad?

Why iPad?

This morning I had a conversation with a teacher in a special school. Two pupils are going to be starting next term; one has an iPad, and the other has a Windows tablet, which they both use for personal communication.  There are other learners in the school who would benefit from this type of technology, and so we discussed the relative merits of each. The local authority ICT team does not provide technical support for iPads, and they cannot be connected to the school wifi: why then, would the school invest in iPads rather than Windows tablets?

Well it depends on what you want to do. The pupil with the iPad has:

  • GoTalk Now (£59.99) for personal communication;
  • ChoiceWorks (£4.99) for visual scheduling;
  • Story Creator (free) for making her own stories;
  • and other apps for supporting literacy, language and numeracy.

Would you buy a Windows tablet for this learner or for other learners with similar needs in the school? No. The apps this learner uses are just not available for Windows. You could use some Windows programs to create something similar - for example, you could buy The Grid 3 (£480) for personal communication, and make some visual schedules using, say, BoardMaker Studio (£249), and get Book Creator (free) for stories. You could use The Grid to create visual schedules as well, but it's just not the same as what you can do with ChoiceWorks. You'll also note that these Windows programs are a lot more expensive. And the plain fact is that they are simply far more apps available for learners with additional support needs on iPad than on Windows.

So when your colleagues in technical support suggest that you just buy Windows tablets because after all, they're all the same, ask them to go away and first find you apps that provide the functions and features that you and your learners need (which may or may not involve running Microsoft Office).

Why Windows tablets?

A couple of weeks ago we loaned a Windows tablet to a young man, for evaluation. He had an older VOCA which he did not use very much, and the main reasons given were that a) he didn't like the voice and b) he felt the device looked clunky and old fashioned. You may argue that these aren't good enough reasons for rejecting a communication aid, and that we should be persuading this 10 year old in a mainstream school to persevere.

Or, we could lend him a slightly shinier device with Stuart, the Scottish computer voice, and find out if the voice and physical design do in fact impact on his communication. 

So he was really quite excited to get his hands on a Windows 11" tablet, running The Grid 3 software, with a Scottish accent. Time and the trial will tell whether it makes the difference in terms of his communication, though.  

So, why go for the Windows tablet instead of an iPad? Primarily because it speaks Scottish. (That's a hint for iOS app developers - go and speak to CereProc about licencing their voices for your apps - and they don't just do Scottish, they also do lots of other accents and languages (Irish, Scottish Gaelic, northern and southern English, West Midlands, Dutch, German, Brazilian Portuguese, Japanese)).

Other reasons for considering a Windows tablet are:

  • you can plug in a mouse, or a trackball, or a joystick, or an eye gaze camera, which suits some users much better than the touchscreen or the switch access option in the iPad;
  • it has a USB port, which can make life easier in schools where Wi-Fi is not as reliable as it should be;
  • the aforementioned technical support may indeed offer you some support, rather than not.

Which is best then?

It depends on what you want to do. It's like asking which bicycle is best - if you want to go down the mountain, get a mountain bike, but if you want to do the Bealach Mor road route, you're much better off with a road bike. (Believe me, I know.)

To make a decision about technology for personal communication or for accessing the curriculum, you need to know what you're trying to achieve, you need to know what is available, and then you can compare them both and come to a decision based on this knowledge. We're here to help!

Tags: voca, ipad, aac, windows tablet

Share this blog

Share on:

  • Twitter share
  • Facebook share
  • linkedin share
  • Google+ share

At present there are: